【France Archives】
I saw Marvel'sInhumansfor free at the show's IMAX premiere,France Archives and I still want my money back.
I can only imagine how fans who forked out actual cash dollars must feel (I'm betting "outraged") -- a cursory glance at the snarky Fandango reviews indicates that large format theaters charged between $13-23 for the ordeal, with some audience members seemingly unaware that the project was an extended TV pilot rather than a movie.
On Sept. 29, fans with the self-preservation instincts to wait for Inhumans' TV debut will have a chance to judge it for themselves on ABC, with an extended, 84-minute cut featuring material that wasn't included in the IMAX release. But have a little self-respect, guys -- time is our most limited resource, and you'll never get that hour and a half back.
SEE ALSO: Marvel's 'Inhumans' trailer is here, and... yikesAs you may have heard, the series centers around the Inhuman royal family -- led by mute monarch Black Bolt (Anson Mount) and his CGI-haired queen Medusa (Serinda Swan) -- who are ostensibly our heroes despite the fact that their overpopulated moon kingdom is on the verge of rebellion and their preferred method of crowd control is a barbaric caste system that shoves everyone without cool superpowers into mines.
The lone voice of reason is Black Bolt's seemingly powerless brother Maximus (Game of Thrones'Iwan Rheon), who points out that Earth is a lot more spacious than the moon, so perhaps the Inhumans should relocate there and stop treating the peasants like cattle? Since Marvel loves its messed up family dynamics, Maximus seems to have studied at the Loki school of villainy, but apparently skipped the classes covering subtlety and showmanship.
Maximus is plotting to overthrow his sourpuss big brother by inciting the plebes against the royals, which seems like a valid course of action given their leadership style, but the show makes it clear that we're supposed to be rooting against him -- mostly because he can't help but be aggressively creepy towards Medusa, as any good one-dimensional villain is contractually obligated to behave towards the female lead when the writer is lazy.
Good luck figuring out the abilities or motivations of the other "heroes," Karnak (Ken Leung), Gorgon (Eme Ikwuakor) and Crystal (Isabelle Cornish), because the show is deeply uninterested in giving them anything important to do -- one of them spends the majority of the second episode literally sitting on a beach, awaiting further instructions.
It's clear that the actors are trying to make the best of the clunky material they've been saddled with, but showrunner and writer Scott Buck has doubled down on all the things you hated most about Iron Fist, the last Marvel property he attempted to adapt (to great critical scorn): Slapdash, poorly choreographed fight scenes; uninspired visual effects; overwrought dialogue; and heroes so devoid of charisma, you're rooting for the giant CGI bulldog to channelGame of Thronesand chow down on all of them.

Unfortunately for Buck and director Roel Reiné, setting the show in a beautiful natural environment like Hawaii isn't an acceptable substitute for establishing a distinctive visual style, and forcing your leads to word-vomit expository dialogue isn't commensurate with character development.
I'm sure Buck is a perfectly nice guy, and I don't begrudge him his desire to pay his bills, but I'm honestly baffled how anyone who sawIron Fist could think "now thisis the guy we want to entrust with one of Marvel's trickiest properties," unless his main selling points were being able to pull this off on schedule and on the cheap (which, according to direct-to-video helmer Reiné, was probably why Marvel tapped him). The House of M should've at least given the Agents of SHIELDteam a crack at it, given that they're already three seasons into dealing with Inhuman mythology with a lot more clarity than what's on display here.
SEE ALSO: Danny Rand is a bad person, and 18 other thoughts I had while watching 'Iron Fist'Marvel Television has given us some of the best comic book adaptations in any medium -- Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, Legion and Agent Carterhave, at their best, elevated the genre beyond the four-color cliches of the past and offered something truly original (perhaps because of the passionate showrunners at the helm) -- but there's nothing unique or groundbreaking about Inhumans, aside from Disney's clever strategy of getting IMAX to pay for part of it.
Much like Marvel and Netflix's recent superhero team-up The Defenders, this feels like a cynical corporate strategy more than a story that needstelling -- a chance to take advantage of a loyal fanbase that trusts the Marvel brand to adapt their characters with love, and to deliver a certain level of quality when they flash that logo on screen.
SEE ALSO: How to build a cinematic universe, according to Marvel mastermind Kevin FeigeWhile the Marvel Cinematic Universe is manufactured according to very precise specifications that rarely deviate from the blockbuster mold, the company's film arm has earned the trust of its audience over more than a dozen, carefully calibrated -- and undeniably fun-- movies. While there have definitely been a couple of duds (sorry, Thor: The Dark Worldand Iron Man 2), their batting average is still pretty impressive: even the worst-reviewed of the bunch scored a 66% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and all MCU films have cleared $100 million at the box office, which speaks to at least somelevel of consumer satisfaction.
But even if you're not forking over $20 bucks plus parking for this ill-conceived experiment, it's hard to imagine that your immediate reaction will be "satisfied." Marvel's latest offering isn't just inhuman, it's downright soulless.
Marvel's Inhumans premieres Friday, Sept. 29 at 8 p.m. on ABC.
Featured Video For You
'Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol. 2' is so far from the original Marvel comics
Topics Marvel
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
Q&A with tendercare founder and CEO Shauna Sweeney
2025-06-26 23:42Why a Renowned Sculptor Voluntarily Entered an Internment Camp
2025-06-26 22:09Wandering the Westminster Dog Show
2025-06-26 22:06An Elegy for “Stringbean” Akeman
2025-06-26 21:55Popular Posts
Quality Assured: What It's Really Like To Test Games For A Living
2025-06-26 23:37Sentinel Species: Meditation on a Life of Birding
2025-06-26 22:58Staff Picks: Morgan Parker, David Grann, George Saunders
2025-06-26 22:53Revisited: Alexander Is Lowered into the Sea
2025-06-26 22:40NYT Strands hints, answers for May 5
2025-06-26 22:14Featured Posts
Best Beats deal: Save $50 on Studio Buds at Best Buy
2025-06-26 23:42Ben Lerner Interviews Alexander Kluge
2025-06-26 23:39Staff Picks: Raymond Pettibon, Jaume Plensa, Carlos Fonseca
2025-06-26 23:02This February 14, Send Vinegar Valentines to Everyone You Hate
2025-06-26 22:23Today's Hurdle hints and answers for April 29, 2025
2025-06-26 21:32Popular Articles
Wordle today: The answer and hints for February 22, 2025
2025-06-26 23:34Every Domestic Thriller Is the Sequel to a Romantic Comedy
2025-06-26 22:44The History of Public Sculpture Is a Long and Sad One
2025-06-26 22:31Thomas Lux, 1946–2017
2025-06-26 21:55Comparing Team Communication Apps: What Do You Get for Free?
2025-06-26 21:41Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (9813)
Fresh Information Network
Best grocery deal: Spend $20 and get $5 off at Amazon
2025-06-26 23:28Shocking Information Network
Bartolomeo Scappi Was the Renaissance’s Most Innovative Chef
2025-06-26 21:48Unobstructed Information Network
For Patrick Modiano, the Past Is a Vexed Question
2025-06-26 21:31Fresh Information Network
I Found This Wastebasket for You
2025-06-26 21:23Exquisite Information Network
Bestway Hydro
2025-06-26 21:06