【Lascivious Nurse Uniform Diary: Two or Three Times, While I’m Wet】
It's hard to believe 15 years have Lascivious Nurse Uniform Diary: Two or Three Times, While I’m Wetpassed since I tested the Pentium 4 series for the first time. At this point I honestly don't remember many of my experiences with the P4 range, if not because of its age then because it was a pretty rubbish series. I do have many fond memories of testing the Core 2 Duo series however.
Six long years after the Pentium 4, we reviewed the first generation Core 2 Duo processors with the dual-core E6000 range and then the quad-core models a year later. To this day the Core 2 Quad Q6600 might be the most popular enthusiast processor we've seen. In fact, almost all Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad chips were notoriously good overclockers and many users still claim to be running overclocked LGA775 processors.
Today we are going to take a look back at the Core 2 CPUs and compare them to the current generation Haswell Celeron, Pentium, Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 parts.
Along the way we will be testing processors such as the 2009/2010 Nehalem Core i5-760 and Core i7-870, as well as the Core i5-2500K and Core i7-2700K Sandy Bridge chips, comprising almost 10 years of Intel mainstream CPUs.
Year | Process | Price | Base / Turbo | Cores / Threads | Socket | |
Core i7-4790K | 2013 | 22nm | $339 | 4.0GHz / 4.4GHz | 4 / 8 | LGA1150 |
Core i5-4670K | 2013 | 22nm | $242 | 3.5GHz / 3.9GHz | 4 / 4 | LGA1150 |
Core i3-4350 | 2013 | 22nm | $138 | 3.6GHz | 2 / 4 | LGA1150 |
Pentium G3220 | 2013 | 22nm | $64 | 3.0GHz | 2 / 2 | LGA1150 |
Celeron G1820 | 2014 | 22nm | $42 | 2.7GHz | 2 / 2 | LGA1150 |
Core i7-2700K | 2011 | 32nm | $332 | 3.5GHz / 3.9GHz | 4 / 8 | LGA1155 |
Core i5-2500K | 2011 | 32nm | $216 | 3.3GHz / 3.7GHz | 4 / 4 | LGA1155 |
Core i7-870 | 2009 | 45nm | $562 | 2.93GHz / 3.6GHz | 4 / 8 | LGA1156 |
Core i5-760 | 2009 | 45nm | $205 | 2.8GHz / 3.33GHz | 4 / 4 | LGA1156 |
Core 2 Quad Q9650 | 2008 | 45nm | $530 | 3.0GHz | 4 / 4 | LGA775 |
Core 2 Quad Q6600 | 2007 | 65nm | $530 | 2.4GHz | 4 / 4 | LGA775 |
Core 2 Duo E8600 | 2008 | 45nm | $266 | 3.33GHz | 2 / 2 | LGA775 |
Core 2 Duo E6600 | 2006 | 65nm | $316 | 2.4GHz | 2 / 2 | LGA775 |
The only mainstream processor series missing is the Ivy Bridge architecture, though we decided to skip it as the performance leap from Sandy Bridge to Haswell wasn't significant. Fifth-generation Broadwell processors are also missing as they are not available yet and with Skylake arriving soon it seems this series is being skipped entirely.
Obviously today's processors are going to be faster than those that are almost a decade old. What we feel is of interest is finding out just how much faster they are in modern applications such as Photoshop CC, x264 HD encoding, and Excel workloads. We'll also look at gaming performance, albeit with an unrealistically powerful discrete GPU that we could've only dreamed of a decade ago.
Finishing up the benchmark phase we'll also compare power consumption to gauge how much more efficient modern day CPUs really are.
System Specs & Memory Bandwidth Performance
Haswell System Specs
| Sandy Bridge System Specs
|
Lynnfield System Specs
| Core 2 System Specs
|
The Core 2 series wasn't blessed with big memory bandwidths and back in the day AMD had one over Intel here with its Athlon64 range which peaked at around 9GB/s. As you can see below, we struggled to get 7GB/s out of the Core 2 Duo E8600 and Core 2 Quad Q9650.
The jump from the Core 2 range to the first Core i5 and Core i7 processors was massive as the i5-760 managed 17.1GB/s and 19.2GB/s for the i7-870. The Sandy Bridge Core i5 and Core i7 processors didn't improve on this with roughly 18GB/s.
However, by the time Haswell came around Intel was pushing well over 20GB/s on this mainstream platform. This means even the cheapest Haswell desktop processor has roughly 4x the memory bandwidth available when compared to the fastest Core 2 processors.
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
Best robot vacuum deal from the Amazon Big Spring Sale
2025-06-26 16:492018 iPad Pro redesign will look kind of like the iPhone 5: Report
2025-06-26 16:02Megyn Kelly's show reportedly ending soon
2025-06-26 15:15Barcelona Open 2025 livestream: Watch live tennis for free
2025-06-26 14:59Popular Posts
5 Affordable Last
2025-06-26 17:33Young swimmers are so inspired by historic Olympian Simone Manuel
2025-06-26 17:17Simone Biles stars in a new ad for Nike
2025-06-26 17:05Update: No, Carlos Matos is not calling bitcoin a scam
2025-06-26 16:26#rateaspecies is basically Yelp reviews for zoo animals
2025-06-26 15:46Featured Posts
4GHz CPU Battle: AMD 2nd
2025-06-26 16:42Hasan Minhaj might be the next great American storyteller
2025-06-26 16:07The Met and Google are bringing the museum online
2025-06-26 15:33iPhone XR teardown reveals that basic repairs are easy
2025-06-26 15:31Popular Articles
Things Intel Needs to Fix
2025-06-26 17:37Michael Phelps says goodbye to the pool with Olympic gold
2025-06-26 17:29More ways to get to the polls for free on Election Day
2025-06-26 16:53New York's 9/11 mayor conveniently forgets about 9/11
2025-06-26 15:27Today's Hurdle hints and answers for May 9, 2025
2025-06-26 15:08Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (48723)
Impression Information Network
Amazon Big Spring Sale 2025: Best deals under $50
2025-06-26 17:13Progress Information Network
New, spooky photo of the Ghost Nebula glows just in time for Halloween
2025-06-26 17:11Neon Information Network
Muslim activists raise thousands for victims of the synagogue shooting
2025-06-26 16:43Leadership Information Network
Stephen King has a new least favourite word and he wants you to stop using it
2025-06-26 16:37Life Information Network
U.N. aims to make carbon emissions cost money at COP 25 climate talks
2025-06-26 16:31