【Girlfriend Who is Crazy About Big Things】
UPDATE: Sept. 1,Girlfriend Who is Crazy About Big Things 2020, 8:32 p.m. PT
Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon issued a statement on Tuesday evening apologizing to Wicks for his decision not to allow her a proxy vote.
“I want to make a full apology to Assemblymember Wicks. My intention was never to be inconsiderate toward her, her role as a legislator, or her role as a mother.
You May Also Like
"Inclusivity and electing more women into politics are core elements of our Democratic values. Nevertheless, I failed to make sure our process took into account the unique needs of our Members. The Assembly needs to do better. I commit to doing better.”
The original story is below.
In the midst of a pandemic, a California lawmaker who had given birth just a month before cast her vote on a bill with her crying baby in her arms.
It didn't have to be this way.
Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks had asked to be allowed to vote by proxy on a housing bill Monday, but her request was denied. The speaker of California's State Assembly, Anthony Rendon, decided she would have to vote in person or not at all. Only those who are considered at higher risk of COVID-19 are allowed to have a legislative leader, a proxy, vote on their behalf, according to Assembly rules introduced in July. As a new mother, Wicks didn't cut it in Rendon's eyes.
Those who are pregnant are at an increased risk of getting COVID-19, according to the CDC. The agency doesn't extend the same warning for people who've recently given birth, but postpartum complications could lead to other health issues that do put one at risk, writes Politico, which first reported on Wicks' vote. Babies under two are at higher risk to contract the virus than older children, but it's rare, according to the Mayo Clinic, a nonprofit medical center and research organization.
"I was actually in the middle of feeding my daughter when this bill came up and I ran down on the floor today because I strongly believe we need to pass this bill. We are 3.5 million homes shy of where we need to be," Wicks said, as her daughter cried in her arms. "And Elly agrees."
"Please, please, please pass this bill, and I'm gonna go finish feeding my daughter."
The bill didn't make it. But another one the Democrat voted for on Monday did. That one would expand the state's paid family leave program if signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Rendon, a Democrat, was just following the Assembly's rules, his spokesperson, Katie Talbot, told Politico in a statement. "The house resolution pertaining to proxy voting is very specific, in that only members at a higher risk from Covid-19 will be considered eligible for proxy voting," she said.
"This bar of eligibility was always intended to be high, to ensure the protection of our legislative process."
Mashable reached out to Wicks' and Rendon's respective offices for comment but received no response by the time of publication.
As Wicks is being commended for showing up with her newborn to make the vote — even by Hillary Clinton, no less (Wicks supported her presidential run) — there's a deeper frustration here.
She shouldn't have been forced to drive more than 80 miles from her Oakland home with her baby in tow to do it. She shouldn't have had to stop feeding her one-month-old to run to the floor and vote. She shouldn't have had to soothe a cranky baby as she pleaded with her colleagues.
SEE ALSO: Exhausted parents: Working from home isn't workingCompassion and workarounds for new parents with few childcare options available is already lacking in America. Add poor interpretations of coronavirus rules to the mix and you tie parents' hands even further. Wicks is a symbol of bigger childcare issues, ones that have only been exacerbated by America's messy and feeble response to the coronavirus.
While Wicks wore a mask and patted her newborn in a striped blanket on the floor, Senate Republicans voted remotely after one of their members tested positive for coronavirus. Whether Wicks was at a higher risk was up to interpretation. She could've voted remotely, too.
Just one man decided that she couldn't.
Topics Social Good Politics Family & Parenting
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
TikTok finally rolls out a creator crediting tool
2025-06-26 11:40Translating Tranströmer: An Interview with Patty Crane
2025-06-26 11:34Klaus Wittkugel, East German Master of Book Design
2025-06-26 10:57Popular Posts
13 Good Games You Can Play on Laptops and Budget PCs
2025-06-26 12:38Best camera deals October Prime Day: GoPro Instax, and more
2025-06-26 11:28Wordle today: The answer and hints for October 11
2025-06-26 11:0230+ Prime Day 2 sex toy deals: LELO, Satisfyer, more
2025-06-26 10:57Draper vs. Arnaldi 2025 livestream: Watch Madrid Open for free
2025-06-26 10:50Featured Posts
Best Prime Day Kindle deal: 25% off 2022 Kindle
2025-06-26 11:38Wordle today: The answer and hints for October 11
2025-06-26 11:16Ukraine President Zelenskyy awards medal to beloved mine
2025-06-26 11:10This is the fattest of the extremely fat bears
2025-06-26 10:38Popular Articles
The Best Gaming Concept Art of 2016
2025-06-26 12:37Road Trip, 12 Cadillacs: A Letter from Patrick Leigh Fermor
2025-06-26 12:08Having Trouble Sleeping? Read This.
2025-06-26 11:59NYT Strands hints, answers for April 23
2025-06-26 10:31Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (911)
Evergreen Information Network
Character AI reveals AvatarFX, a new AI video generator
2025-06-26 12:15Defense Information Network
Three Paintings and Two Sculptures by Izumi Kato
2025-06-26 11:41Wisdom Convergence Information Network
Prime Day 2023 luggage deals: Shop from top brands like Samsonite and SwissGear
2025-06-26 11:13Exciting Information Network
That Time I Went to the Russian Cat Circus
2025-06-26 11:08Exquisite Information Network
Dyson V8 Plus cordless vacuum: $120 off at Amazon
2025-06-26 10:27