【Watch A MILFS Desires Online】
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Watch A MILFS Desires OnlineWikipedia.
Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper theDaily Mailas a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable."
SEE ALSO: Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl endingThe Daily Mail's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the Daily Mail.
Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews.
Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the Daily Mailas a source only in limited situations.
One user commented with a "strong oppose" comment that "The Daily Mail, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people."

Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication."
The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the Daily Mail is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page.
The ruling does not mean the Mailcan never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source.
The Mailjoins the National Enquirer among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular. The Sunand the Daily Mirrorare also seen as unreliable. Wikipedia also warns against using state-run media like China's Xinhua or Iran's Press TV as sources.
Additional reporting by Jason Abbruzzese.
Featured Video For You
Even Fox News is defending CNN against Trump
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
Bolsonaro Rising
2025-06-26 02:39Easy DIY Christmas gift ideas
2025-06-26 00:52The Feminist Horizon
2025-06-26 00:43Popular Posts
Who’s Afraid of the Russian Soul?
2025-06-26 02:14'OlabeatsUber' trends on Indian Twitter for all the wrong reasons
2025-06-26 02:09This Could Revolutionize That
2025-06-26 00:59Featured Posts
The Forgotten Man
2025-06-26 02:08The best 'Mega Man' games ever are going mobile
2025-06-26 01:41The most memorable lines from Obama's 8 years in office
2025-06-26 01:25The Queer Art of Failing Better
2025-06-26 01:15Popular Articles
They Want New Blood
2025-06-26 02:1611 terrible beauty trends from 2016 that need to die
2025-06-26 02:1511 good things of 2016
2025-06-26 01:26I Am Not a Fish Dating a Bird
2025-06-26 01:06Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (3289)
Theme Information Network
Stalking the Story
2025-06-26 02:05Evergreen Information Network
Machine learning will make sure no one steals your logo
2025-06-26 02:04Evergreen Information Network
Alex Trebek, Ken Jennings and more remember 'Jeopardy!' champion who passed away
2025-06-26 00:49Belief Information Network
You can now use 3 new Snapchat filters while riding in an Uber
2025-06-26 00:21Unique Information Network
Reimagining the Middle Class
2025-06-26 00:20