【Movies | Movies free | Movies latest 2022】
As the hype around generative AI continues to build,Movies | Movies free | Movies latest 2022 the need for robust safety regulations is only becoming more clear.
Now Anthropic—the company behind Claude AI—is looking at how its models could deceive or sabotage users. Anthropic just dropped a paper laying out their approach.
SEE ALSO: Sam Altman steps down as head of OpenAI's safety groupAnthropic’s latest research — titled "Sabotage Evaluations for Frontier Models" — comes from its Alignment Science team, driven by the company's "Responsible Scaling" policy.
You May Also Like
The goal is to gauge just how capable AI might be at misleading users or even "subverting the systems we put in place to oversee them." The study focuses on four specific tactics: Human Decision Sabotage, Code Sabotage, Sandbagging, and Undermining Oversight.
Think of users who push ChatGPT to the limit, trying to coax it into generating inappropriate content or graphic images. These tests are all about ensuring that the AI can’t be tricked into breaking its own rules.
In the paper, Anthropic says its objective is to be ready for the possibility that AI could evolve into something with dangerous capabilities. So they put their Claude 3 Opus and 3.5 Sonnet models through a series of tests, designed to evaluate and enhance their safety protocols.
The Human Decision test focused on examining how AI could potentially manipulate human decision-making. The second test, Code Sabotage, analyzed whether AI could subtly introduce bugs into coding databases. Stronger AI models actually led to stronger defenses against these kinds of vulnerabilities.
The remaining tests — Sandbagging and Undermining Oversight — explored whether the AI could conceal its true capabilities or bypass safety mechanisms embedded within the system.
For now, Anthropic’s research concludes that current AI models pose a low risk, at least in terms of these malicious capabilities.
"Minimal mitigations are currently sufficient to address sabotage risks," the team writes, but "more realistic evaluations and stronger mitigations seem likely to be necessary soon as capabilities improve."
Translation: watch out, world.
Topics Artificial Intelligence Cybersecurity
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
The Gray Place
2025-06-25 22:37Zoom is down in some parts of the U.S.
2025-06-25 22:25Justin Trudeau met the Queen of England to the internet's delight
2025-06-25 21:37France seeks to end the sale of gas and diesel
2025-06-25 21:31Hot World, Cooler Heads
2025-06-25 21:29Popular Posts
You Know You Want It
2025-06-25 23:12'Bake Off' is still happening this year. Here's how they filmed it.
2025-06-25 22:10Flint, A Complete City
2025-06-25 20:42Featured Posts
Control-Alt-Fail
2025-06-25 22:52TikTok confirms plan to sue the Trump administration over U.S. ban
2025-06-25 22:26'Handmaid's Tale' protestors greet Trump in Poland
2025-06-25 22:17Othering the Godman
2025-06-25 21:58Popular Articles
If They Are Not Coming For You Today
2025-06-25 23:07The asteroid headed towards us on Election Day 2020 is all hype
2025-06-25 22:47Everything coming to Netflix in September 2020
2025-06-25 21:42The Musk of Success
2025-06-25 21:07Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (545)
Exploration Information Network
We Don’t Have Elections
2025-06-25 23:04Vigorous Information Network
United is now literally taking things from children
2025-06-25 22:25Opportunity Information Network
Sega’s Dreamcast is the unsung gaming hero of the 2000s
2025-06-25 21:55Future Information Network
Snoop Dogg just dragged Rob Kardashian hard for those Blac Chyna pictures
2025-06-25 21:38Fresh Information Network
Afternoon at the Nap Factory
2025-06-25 20:58